Direction
The Rhino and Grasshopper model holds the design as a field of relationships rather than a fixed sculpture. Controlled studies change proportion, shell height, roof depth, overhang and pore density one variable at a time.
05 / 09COMPUTATIONAL DESIGN · PARAMETRIC
A stadium enclosure shaped through a porous gyroid field
RoleComputational design, parametric modelling & visualisation
StatusCourse study
Halo explores how a porous gyroid field can wrap a low stadium enclosure while the shell, roof and central opening remain legible as separate parts of one adjustable system.
AI-assisted portfolio ArcViz interpretation, not a photograph, built project, performance claim or Rhino output.
The Rhino and Grasshopper model holds the design as a field of relationships rather than a fixed sculpture. Controlled studies change proportion, shell height, roof depth, overhang and pore density one variable at a time.
A conceptual parametric study documented through a source render and comparison board, then interpreted as an AI-assisted ArcViz image for the portfolio. It is not presented as a built, engineered or submitted stadium.
The outer shell is not drawn as a decorative façade after the fact. It comes from the same parametric logic across every version, making the effect of each change visible rather than hiding it inside a single final image.


The opening ArcViz gives the concept scale and atmosphere. The source render and variation board remain on the page so the generated image never replaces the actual computational design work behind it.
Parametric model, Controlled variation study, Rhino visualisation, AI-assisted portfolio ArcViz
Rhino, Grasshopper, AI-assisted visualisation
The parametric model and variation work were developed in Rhino and Grasshopper. The opening image is a separate AI-assisted portfolio ArcViz interpretation, not a photograph, built project, performance claim or Rhino output.